Scientists are questioning the value of teaching to students' learning styles and are now simply advocating "mixing things up" and spreading learning out over a longer period of time to help students understand and retain information/concepts. Check out this
article from NPR.org and decide for yourself.
I think that one of the largest factors of learning styles that has been largely ignored is that they have always been considered learning style *theories*, meaning they may not necessarily be scientifically true.
ReplyDeleteInstead of eliminating the learning styles completely, maybe we should have students focus on the learning style that does *not* come naturally to them. For example, have a "visual learner" focus on becoming a better writer and listener, or have an "auditory learner" focus more on learning from visual representations of lessons. This way they become more well-rounded, flexible thinkers instead of believing there is only that one specific way they will ever learn.
I like your thinking, Sam, and I've always wondered about that myself -- should we always be trying to teach to students' strengths? Like you, I think not. Thanks for your thoughtful reply to this post!
ReplyDelete